Acacia+Team+Discussion

Use this site to add to or delete your discussions on marking.

 * Here is how I marked the two labs. Looking forward to hearing what you made of them. **
 * Gus **

Pl – ppp – research question relatively unfocused, time of day/weather key factors not mentioned, more sites required for reliable picture
 * Carbon dioxide lab; **

DCP – ppc – no qualitative observations, further processing would have been good.

DEC – pcc – discussion could be supported more, evaluation really good and conclusion OK.

Pl – ppc – term ‘ratio’ in research question confusing, variables a bit of a mess/no random sampling evident.
 * Shoreline lab; **

DCP – ppp - recording table poor, questionable calculation and final result not expressed well

DEC – npc – no clear discussion, evaluation could be deeper, conclusion OK